□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 20, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT David J. Bradley, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CARLOS HERNANDEZ, § § Plaintiff, § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-442 § SOCIAL SECURITY, § § Defendant. § §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R), entered on November 21, 2019. (D.E. 13). The M&R

- recommends that the Court dismiss Hernandez’s petition without prejudice for want of prosecution. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate □

Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the

1/2

M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 13). Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. SIGNED and ORDERED this Z oF G, of Febr f° 2p20f A S. MORALES . UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2