‘ Southern District of Texas . ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT wt | □□□□□□ Olen SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION LUCIANO BALADEZ § Plaintiff, V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-276 G. MILLER, et al., Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R), entered on January 15, 2020. (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for want of prosecution. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order . No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution.

SIGNED and ORDERED this _ | y.of Felpruary 2420.

DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2