UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 23, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

GREGORY MICHAEL LEWIS, § § Petitioner, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-322 § 148TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES § COUNTY TEXAS, et al, § § Respondents. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 6, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 12), recommending that this matter be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Petitioner was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 12), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action 1s DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2020.

Joh GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2