Downum v. City Of Rockport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 23, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CHRISTOPHER JOESPH DOWNUM, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-342 § CITY OF ROCKPORT, et al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE On March 12, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case” (D.E. 15). The Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 15), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2020.

Joh GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2