UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 07, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

JOHN T. PATRICK, § § Petitioner, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-033 § LORIE DAVIS, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 3, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby entered his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 14), recommending that this action be dismissed. The Petitioner was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 14), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this habeas corpus action is DISMISSED. In the event that Petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability, that request is DENIED. ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2020. ia. GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2