Henderson v. Berryhill
Henderson v. Berryhill
Trial Court Opinion
□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 11, 2020 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION SHANNON M. HENDERSON, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-2438 § ANDREW SAUL, § Commissioner of the Social Security § Administration, § § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on June 10, 2020, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.;
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219(Sth Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision denying social security benefits is supported by substantial evidence in the record and that the Administrative Law Judge properly applied the legal standards. Henderson’s motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 6), is denied, and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 7), is granted. Final judgment dismissing this case with prejudice is entered by separate order. SIGNED on August 11, 2020, at Houston, Texas.
Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown