UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 10, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

ALHAKIM HAIDER, § § Petitioner, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-402 § LORIE DAVIS, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R), entered on July 1, 2020. (D.E. 22). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss this action. It is further recommended that a Certificate of Appealability be denied. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 22). Accordingly, Respondent’s motion for summary judgment (D.E. 20) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Accordingly, a Certificate of Appealability is also hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas November 10, 2020