Fisher v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP

District Court, S.D. Texas

Fisher v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 30, 2020 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION

SHANE FISHER, § § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-19-4930 § CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL § COMPANY, LP, § § Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This court has reviewed de novo the Memorandum and Recommendation on the motion filed by the defendant, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company L.P., to enforce the settlement agreement it reached with the plaintiff, Shane Fisher, and dismiss this case with prejudice. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.;

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219

(5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that Judge Sheldon’s decision is amply supported by the record and the law. This court finds and concludes the parties entered into an enforceable contract, by email exchange that contained an offer and acceptance, and was a meeting of the minds on all essential terms of settlement, including payment by the defendant and release and waiver by the plaintiff. The parties manifested their assent to the material terms of the settlement agreement. Chevron Phillips’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement, (Docket Entry No. 31), is granted. Fisher’s motions to set aside, to unseal, to extend, and to compel production, are denied. Chevron Phillips’s motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 23), is moot. Final judgment dismissing this case with prejudice is entered by separate order. SIGNED on December 30, 2020, at Houston, Texas.

LW CreWeo Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown