UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00523 Kendra Hankerd, Plaintiff, Vv. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., Defendants. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER On November 20, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell issued a report and recommendation that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) be de- nied and that her complaint (Doc. 1) be dismissed with preju- dice as barred by the doctrine of res judicata! and as frivolous pursuant to

(e)(2)(B). Doc. 5. The report also recommends barring the plaintiff from filing any new law- suits in this district without payment of the full filing fee. The report was sent to the plaintiff at her last known ad- dress by certified mail. It was returned with the notation “not known unable to forward.” Doc. 7. The plaintiff has not pro- vided the court with a current address or filed written objec- tions to the report. The court finds no “clear error on the face of the record.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,

(Sth Cir. 1996) (en banc) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983)). Therefore, the court adopts the mag- istrate judge’s findings and conclusions. Plaintiff's motion to

' See Hankerd v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., No. 6:18-cv-00204; Hankerd v. United States of America, et al., No. 6:19-cv-00063; and Hank- erd v. State of Tennessee, et al., No. 6:19-cv-00195.

proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice as barred by the doctrine of res judicata and as frivolous pursuant to

(e)(2)(B). In addition, the plaintiff is barred from filing any new law- suits in this district without payment of the full filing fee. Any motion not previously ruled on is denied. So ordered by the court on January 17, 2020. field BARKER United States District Judge

_2-