Muckleroy v. Price
Muckleroy v. Price
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00464 Rodney Dewayne Muckleroy, Plaintiff, v. Liz Price et al., Defendants. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER Before the court are the findings of fact and recommenda- tion of United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Doc. 6. Judge Love recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order. Id. On December 11, 2019, a copy of the report and rec- ommendation was mailed to plaintiff at his last known ad- dress, return receipt requested. Since then, plaintiff has not objected to the report and recommendation. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation within 14 days of service, the district court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996) (en banc) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory comnnittee’s note (1983)). Here, there is no clear error. Therefore, the magistrate judge’s report and recommen- dation (Doc. 6) is adopted. This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. Any outstanding motions are denied as moot. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. So ordered by the court on January 23, 2020.
J} “CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown