Ford v. Cerliano

District Court, E.D. Texas

Ford v. Cerliano

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00237 Stephen D. Ford, Plaintiff, V. Maxey Cerliano, et al., Defendants. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee confined in the Gregg County Jail, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report (Doc. 9) recommending that plaintiff's complaint be dis- missed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The report was mailed to plaintiff on October 31, 2019 but re- turned as undeliverable on November 18, 2019. Doc. 10. On November 20, 2019, the report was, again, mailed to plaintiff's last known address. As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recom- mendations. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). There being no objections, and the court being satisfied that the report contains no clear error, the court adopts the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge as the find- ings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly ordered that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. So ordered by the court on January 7, 2020. flab BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown