Boehm v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Texas

Boehm v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00420 Jason Alexander Boehm, Plaintiff, V. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for summary judgment. Doc. 10. Plaintiff did not respond. On March 13, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell issued a report and recommendation that defend- ant’s motion be granted and the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 12. No objections were filed. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation within 14 days of service, the district court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(Sth Cir. 1996) (en banc) (cleaned up). Here, there is no clear error. Therefore, the magistrate judge’s report and recommen- dation (Doc. 12) is adopted. The motion for summary judg- ment (Doc. 10) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Any motion not previously ruled on is denied as moot. So ordered by the court on March 31, 2020. faobn BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown