Lilly v. Ost

District Court, E.D. Texas

Lilly v. Ost

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00474 Tracy E. Lilly, Plaintiff, V. Dr. Loren Ost, Defendant. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER On March 13, 2020, Judge Mitchell issued a report and rec- ommendation that plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment be denied. Doc. 15. The court delivered a copy of the report to the plaintiff by certified mail. It was received by plaintiff on March 19, 2020. Doc. 16. No objections have been filed. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommen- dation within 14 days of service, the district court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the rec- ord.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto, Ass'n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996) (cleaned up). Here, there is no clear error. Therefore, the magistrate judge’s report and recommen- dation (Doc. 15) is adopted. The motion for relief from judg- ment (Doc. 11) is denied. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 13) is denied as moot.

So ordered by the court on April 3, 2020. [abe BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown