Tolar v. Hays
Tolar v. Hays
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION JUSTIN TOLAR § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv129 WARDEN HAYS, ET AL. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff Justin Tolar, an inmate confined at the Stringfellow Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Analysis The Civil Rights Act,
42 U.S.C. § 1981, et. seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by
28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bales,
58 F.R.D. 453(N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curiam,
480 F.2d 805(5th Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship,
28 U.S.C. § 1391provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Plaintiff complains of events which occurred at the Stringfellow Unit, which is located in Brazoria County. In addition, the defendants appear to reside in Brazoria County. Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 124, Brazoria County is located in the Galveston Division of the Southern District of Texas, rather than in the Eastern District. As Brazoria County is located in the Southern District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper. When venue is not proper, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought."
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). ORDER It is accordingly ORDERED this case is TRANSFERRED to the Galveston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown