Gatewood v. Hargrove

District Court, E.D. Texas

Gatewood v. Hargrove

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

WILLIAM GATEWOOD § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18cv96 OFFICER HARGROVE, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Plaintiff William Gatewood filed this civil action under

42 U.S.C. §1983

complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. This Court referred the lawsuit to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636

(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges. Gatewood was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $13.80, in accordance with

28 U.S.C. §1915

(b). When he did not comply, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Gatewood received a copy of this Report but filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected- to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

492 U.S. 918

,

109 S.Ct. 3243

(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”) It is accordingly 1 ORDERED the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 6) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Finally, it 1s ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of April, 2020.

RODNEY GILSTRAP \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown