Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:20-cv-00132 Damotress Bailey, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER On March 18, 2020, plaintiff Damotress Bailey filed this civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 205(g), for judicial review of the commissioner’s denial of plaintiff's application for social security benefits. Doc. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636. Doc. 2. On March 19, 2020, Judge Love issued a sealed order di- recting plaintiff's counsel to either: “(1) voluntarily dismiss this action; (2) pay the total $400 filing fee; or (3) refile a mo- tion to proceed in forma pauperis with a complete, accurate, and truthful affidavit reflecting plaintiff's inability to pay the filing fee.” Doc. 4. Plaintiff's counsel was emailed that order the next day, and mailed the order via certified mail, return receipt requested. More than a month passed, and plaintiff's counsel took no action. On May 6, 2020, Judge Love issued a report and recom- mendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Doc. 5. Plaintiff's counsel was served with the report that same day via the court’s electronic filing system. See
id.The report in- formed plaintiff of his right to file written objections within 14 days and warned that a failure to do so would bar a party from de novo review by the district judge.
Id.More than 14
days have passed since plaintiff received the report and rec- ommendation. No objections have been filed. The court finds no “clear error on the face of the record.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996) (en banc). Accordingly, the report and recommen- dation (Doc. 5) is adopted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pros- ecute and failure to comply with a court order. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.
So ordered by the court on June 15, 2020. [lackees BARKER United States District Judge
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown