District Court, E.D. Texas, 2020

Helton v. Powledge Unit

Helton v. Powledge Unit
District Court, E.D. Texas · Decided September 21, 2020
Helton v. Powledge Unit

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SHANNON EUGENE LANE HELTON § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20cv296 POWLEDGE UNIT, ET AL. § ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 14) concluding that Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Docket No. 9) should be denied.

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Here, Plaintiff did not file objections in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews his legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”).

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 14) as the findings of this Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 14) is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Docket No. 9) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of September, 2020. en D Korb JERQMY D, RERNODIE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.