Smith v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Smith v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DANIEL THOMASON SMITH, § § Petitioner, § § versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-279 § WARDEN FCC BEAUMONT, § § Respondent. § MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Daniel Thomason Smith, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning the petition. The magistrate judge recommends the petition be dismissed. The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court must therefore conduct a de novo review of the objections in light of the pleadings and the applicable law. Petitioner challenges several criminal convictions. The magistrate judge correctly concluded that as petitioner’s grounds for review are not based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision that establishes he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense, he may not assert his grounds for review in a petition filed pursuant to Section 2241. Reyes-Requena v. United States,
243 F.3d 893, 894(5th Cir. 2001). ORDER Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown