IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RONALD DUNBAR, #47739-177 § Petitioner, § § v. § No. 3:19-CV-2066-D § No. 3:15-CR-433-D § ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, § Respondent. § ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The undersigned district judge has reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for habeas corpus under

is denied. The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See

(a)(3); Fed. R. App. p. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor,

, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the findings and recommendation, the court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King,

(5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, petitioner may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh,

; Fed. R. App. p. 24(a)(5). SO ORDERED. January 28, 2020.

Sones A. Lobe SENIOR JUDGE