Dade v. Chitty
Dade v. Chitty
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
JACQUEZ DADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) MICHAEL CHITTY, ef al., ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-2815-C
ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Michael Chitty and Ronald Herrington should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C, §§ 1915A and 1915(e). The Magistrate Judge has further advised that Plaintiffs claims against Officer Jason Tidwell should be dismissed pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477(1994).' The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Michael Chitty and Ronald Herrington are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e). Furthermore, Plaintiff's claims
' Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired.
against Officer Jason Tidwell are DISMISSED pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey. SO ORDERED this A 0 day of April, 2020.
atte C} wh 40rr* / ) \SAMR. CU GS fi SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown