Medrano v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Medrano v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ARTURO S. MEDRANO, #1894196, ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) No. 3:20-CV-0860-B (BH) ) LORIE DAVIS, Director, ) Texas Department of Criminal ) Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, ) Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclu- sions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclu- sions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and after considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability on the judgment entered on July 18, 2020. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation in support of its finding that the petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and (2) that reasonable jurists would find it “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SIGNED this 24" day of August, 2020.
JANZ J. BOYI UDATED ST S DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown