United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DAMION D. FLOWERS § v. CEVIL NO. 3:19-CV-2090-S-BK ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING, etal. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 1, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 8. On December 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed objections. See ECF No. 15. On May 11, 2020, the Court entered an order overruling Plaintiff’s objections and, construing Plaintiff's objections as a motion for leave to amend, granted Plaintiff leave to file a proposed amended complaint by June 11, 2020, otherwise the action would be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s October 1, 2019 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See ECF No. 18. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed a proposed amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that that this action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See FED. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See

(a)(3); FED. R. App. P, 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh y. Taylor,

, 202 and n.21 (Sth Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no

legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King,

(Sth Cir, 1983).' In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh,

; Fep. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). SO ORDERED. SIGNED October 8, 2020 /

SAREN GREN SCHOLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

' Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith,