Russell v. Elias

District Court, S.D. Texas

Russell v. Elias

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 25, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION

PATRICK RUSSELL., § TDCJ # 02286489 , § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-3840 § MS. ELIAS, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Patrick Russell, an inmate in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division (“TDCJ”), proceeds pro se. On November 13, 2020, the Court issued a notice of deficient pleading (Dkt. 3) instructing Plaintiff to pay $400 or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified trust fund account statement. The notice warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s instructions within thirty days could lead to dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk supplied Plaintiff with the necessary form. Plaintiff’s deadline for compliance was December 14, 2020. To date, he has not paid the filing fee or submitted an in forma pauperis application. Under the inherent powers necessarily vested in a district court to manage its own affairs, the Court determines that dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Gates v. Strain,

885 F.3d 874

(5th Cir. 2018); Nottingham v. Warden, Bill Clements Unit,

837 F.3d 438

, 440–41 (5th Cir. 2016) (a district court may dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute an action or to comply with court orders). However, upon a proper showing from Plaintiff and compliance with all past orders from the Court, relief from this order may be granted in accordance with Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk will provide a copy of this order to the parties. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 25th day of January, 2021. Aeorap C lon GEORGE C!HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2

Reference

Status
Unknown