Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT June 22, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION BUZZ BEGIER, § Plaintiff, VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-7 DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, et al, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 17). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 17). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 15) and DISMISSES this action as time barred. A certificate of appealability is also DENIED. A final judgment will be entered separately following 1/2

this order. SO ORDERED. □ | DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas June Pot 2021

2/2