UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 23, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

ROY TREJO, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-089 § NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, § § Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On June 21, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Want of Prosecution” (D.E. 8). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 8), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2021. Jbl GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2