. . Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 06, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CENTRAL TEXAS EXPRESS § METALWORK, LLC; dba EXPRESS § CONTRACTING, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-193 § ELIZABETH YETMAN CHAVEZ, et al., § § . Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 103). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to dismiss. (D-E. 94). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is □

clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R

1/2

in its entirety. (D.E. 103). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to dismiss. (D.E. 94). All claims in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. / DA . MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas October 6, 2021

2/2