Southern District of Texas . ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 06, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk ‘ CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION AMENSUYAHTEHUTISHAKTI fka § VARGAS, § Plaintiff, : VS. . □ § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-144 PHILIP SEFUENTES, et al,, : Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. Id. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case pursuant to Rule 1/2

41(b). All claims in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. : | DAVIDS. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas . October 6, 2021

2/2