Amensuyahtehutishakti v. Sefuentes

Southern District of Texas . ENTERED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 06, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

‘ CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

AMENSUYAHTEHUTISHAKTI fka § VARGAS, §

Plaintiff, :

VS. . □ § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-144 PHILIP SEFUENTES, et al,, :

Defendants. :

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. Id.

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015).

Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case pursuant to Rule 1/2 41(b). All claims in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately.

SO ORDERED. : |

DAVIDS. MORALES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas .

October 6, 2021 2/2