UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 02, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

PABLO ENRIQUE URIBE, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00151 § MARTHA ARMIJO, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On September 27, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case” (M&R, D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that, on initial screening, the claims be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and that the dismissal count as a strike under the three strikes law. Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 11), and all other relevant documents in the record, and 1 / 2 finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim for relief pursuant to §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). It is further ORDERED that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of

(g), and the Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes @txs.uscourts. gov. ORDERED on November 2, 2021.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2