Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 04, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IAIME CISNEROS, § Petitioner, : VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-212 BOBBY LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR, TDCJ, Respondent. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 4). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the petition pursuant to the screening provisions in Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (D.E. 1; D.E. 4). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Clv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 4). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Cisneros’s habeas corpus petition pursuant to the screening provisions in Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (D.E. 1). A final judgment will be entered separately.

SO ORDERED. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas November zo , 2021

2/2