. Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ December 06, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION TABARI STRONG, et al., §

Plaintiffs, : VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-171 BOBBY LUMPKIN, et ai., : Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 18). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff Bihl’s case and close the case as to the remaining two Plaintiffs, Strong and Williams. (D.E. 18). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

6(b)(1): FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 18). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: . (1) Plaintiff Bihl’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). | '

(2) This case is closed as to Plaintiffs Strong and Williams, as those two plaintiffs have now filed separate complaints that will be assigned new case numbers. A final judgment will be entered separately to close this case. SO ORDERED. \ / DAVID S¥MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas December L{f72021

2/2 □