Ramirez v. State Of Texas
Ramirez v. State Of Texas
Trial Court Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 13, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JESSE LEE RAMIREZ, § Plaintiff : VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-184 STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. Jd. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,
2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case pursuant to Rule
1/2
41(b). All claims in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. □
SO ORDERED. DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas December $7; 2021
2/2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown