Tennyson v. Hatton
Tennyson v. Hatton
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:16-cv-01206 Gregory Dewayne Tennyson, Plaintiff, V. Bruce Hatton et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Gregory Tennyson filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to Untied States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Having conducted a proceeding in the form and manner prescribed by
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3), the magistrate judge recommended that the lawsuit be dismissed. Plaintiff filed a document styled as a notice of appeal, which was erro- neously denoted as objections on the docket sheet. Doc. 193. This filing did not contain any substantive objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. See
id.Therefore, no timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation has been filed. See Douglass v. United States Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The motions for summary judgment of defendants Bryce Hatton (Doc. 172) and Clayton Taylor (Doc. 174) are granted. The court orders that the above styled civil action is dismissed with prejudice as to all of plaintiff's claims except for his state law claims against Sheriff Larry Smith and the Smith County Sheriff’s Department. These claims are dismissed with prejudice as to their being
refiled in federal court, but without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to proceed on these claims in state court. The statute of limitations on these state law claims is suspended for 30 days following the entry of final judgment. Any motions that may be pending in this civil action are hereby denied. So ordered by the court on February 9, 2021. [hace BARKER United States District Judge
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown