Williamson v. Brady

District Court, E.D. Texas

Williamson v. Brady

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00324 Bruce Cliett Williamson and Maja Mason Steele, Plaintiffs, V. Billy Bob Brady and Long Glade Lake, Inc., Defendants.

ORDER On July 17, 2019, plaintiffs Bruce Cliett Williamson and Maja Mason Steele filed this civil rights action. Doc. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b). On November 24, 2020, defendants Billy Bob Brady and Long Glade Lake, Inc. filed a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. Doc. 33. Plaintiffs did not file a response. On May 28, 2021, the magistrate judge entered a report recom- mending that the court grant defendants’ motion in part, dis- missing with prejudice Counts I and IV and dismissing with- out prejudice Counts V, VI, and VII.! Doc. 34. No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,

79 F.3d 1415

, 1420 6th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court ac- cepts its findings and recommendation. Defendants’ motion is granted in part. Plaintiffs’ claims under Counts I and IV are dismissed with prejudice and plaintiffs’ claims under Counts V, VL, and VII are dismissed without prejudice.

1 The court previously dismissed counts II and III. See Doc. 32.

So ordered by the court on June 17, 2021.

J “CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown