District Court, E.D. Texas, 2021

Graham v. Dobbs

Graham v. Dobbs
District Court, E.D. Texas · Decided September 22, 2021
Graham v. Dobbs

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ANTHONY GRAHAM, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION No. 1:21-cv-378 v. §

§ JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

WARDEN DOBBS, ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Anthony Graham, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Warden Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corporation, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #3). The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. Proper notice was given to the Plaintiff at his last known address. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C). No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

Conclusion

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #3) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.

SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2021.

Michael J. ‘Truncale United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.