Leisure v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, E.D. Texas

Leisure v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

RUSTY LEISURE, § §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-00075-RWS Plaintiff, §

§ v. §

§ FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, § WARDEN SALMONSON, § § Defendants. §

ORDER Plaintiff Rusty Leisure, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. Bowen, et al., v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al., 5:20-cv-62-RWS-CMC, Docket No. 1 (Apr. 29, 2020). The Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636

(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges. The above-captioned matter was then severed from the originally filed case. Docket No. 1. On February 22, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending dismissal of the lawsuit for failure to prosecute or obey an order of the Court. Docket No. 4. Plaintiff received a copy of this Report on February 26, 2021, but no objections have been received. Docket No. 5. Plaintiff is therefore barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas,

858 F.3d 348, 352

(5th Cir. 2017). Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings in this matter and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir.), cert. denied,

492 U.S. 918

, (1989) (finding that where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 4) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 18th day of November, 2021.

foobert Lv e ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown