IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

KELLEN POWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Executive ) Office, Office of the Legal Adviser, ) ) Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-1789-C-BN

ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss should be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).' The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made.

(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989), After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error, It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby

' Plaintiff filed objections to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on June 3

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be DISMISSED without rejudice. prejudice y [ SO ORDERED this_4/_ day of June, 2021.

vif 417077 A SA □□ GS SENYOR D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Zz