Williams v. Sterrect
Williams v. Sterrect
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
ALEXANDER A. WILLIAMS, § #19042243 § § Petitioner, § v. § Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-2905-X-BH § LEW STERRECT, § § Respondent. §
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241[Doc. No. 9], received on February 24, 2020, is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and the petitioner’s non-habeas claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to seeking relief in a civil rights case. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal inmate to appeal the denial of relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241.1If the petitioner files a notice of
1 See Padilla v. United States,
416 F.3d 424, 425(5th Cir. 2005). appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. IT ISSO ORDERED this 16th day of June, 2021.
BRANTLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown