Dalouche v. Johnson
Dalouche v. Johnson
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MAXIME EDWARD DALOUCHE, ) Petitioner, ) vs. No. 3:20-CV-2914-N-BH JIMMY JOHNSON, Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclu- sions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclu- sions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241, received on September 22, 2020 (doc. 3), is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal detainee to appeal the denial of relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States,
416 F. 424, 425 (Sth Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SIGNED this 28" day of May, 2021. yy Dee
Reference
- Status
- Unknown