Anthony v. Director, TDCJ-CID

District Court, N.D. Texas

Anthony v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Trial Court Opinion

United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JAMES DEDUAN ANTHONY, § TDCJ No. 2223552 § v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-1570-S-BN DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID., ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case [ECF No. 4]. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court therefore TRANSFERS Petitioner’s unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas application to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for appropriate action. And, because the Court is transferring the application to the Fifth Circuit, a certificate of appealability (a COA) is not necessary. See United States v. Fulton,

780 F.3d 683, 688

(5th Cir. 2015) (“[A] transfer order under

28 U.S.C. § 1631

is not a final order within the meaning of § 2253(c)(1)(B), and the appeal of such an order does not require a COA.”); Guel-Rivas v. Stephens,

599 F. App’x 175, 175

(Sth Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (applying Fulton’s holding to transfer of a successive Section 2254 application). SO ORDERED. SIGNED August 11, 2021

Reference

Status
Unknown