UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 15, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

GABRIEL RYAN ANDLER, § § Petitioner, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00134 § COX, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On January 13, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation” (M&R, D.E. 19), recommending that this action be dismissed as moot. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 19), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the 1 / 2 Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 17) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. ORDERED on February 15, 2022. [phy GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2