UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 15, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

LEEANN TIJERINA, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-00287 § SUPPLEMENTAL SOCIAL SECURITY § ADMINISTRATION, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On January 12, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation” (M&R, D.E. 36), recommending that Plaintiff’s brief, construed as a motion for summary judgment (D.E. 31), be denied and that Defendant’s responsive brief, construed as a cross-motion for summary judgment (D.E. 35) be granted and that this action be dismissed. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). 1 / 2 Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 36), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff's brief, construed as a motion for summary judgment (D.E. 31) is DENIED, Defendant’s responsive brief, construed as a cross-motion for summary judgment (D.E. 35) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED on February 15, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2