□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT voenualy 2 ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS athan Gensner, CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

AGUSTIN NUNEZ REYNOSO, § § Plaintiff, § □□ § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00116 § COX, © § cs § Defendant.’ §

QRDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION» Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 25). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED-R: Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 25).

1/2

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. 4 S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas February Z¢+7-2022

2/2