Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 21, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION SIDNEY MAURICE THOMPSON, § Plaintiff, : V. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-8 MARLON THOMAS, ef al., Defendants. :

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that Plaintiffs case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Jd. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. ) DA . MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas March , 2021

2/2