UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 24, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

ROY JACKSON, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00285 § SIAN SCHILHAB, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On February 7, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Want of Prosecution” (M&R, D.E. 10). The Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 10), and all other relevant documents in the record, and 1 / 2 finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. ORDERED on March 24, 2022.

N be GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2