Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 08, 2022 | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

HERSCHEL J HURD, JR., § § Plaintiff, § VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00300 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ARS),§ Defendant. □□

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 7). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 7).

1/2

Accordingly: (1) Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED without prejudice failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (2) Clerk of Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED. DAMID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas April 32+ 2022

2/2