□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 09, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

WALTER KEVIN GUY, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00031 § J.C. HOOPER, ef al., § § : Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 8). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the Mé&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders. FED. R. Clv. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to close this case. SO ORDERED. | ) | DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus ples Texas May Gf; 2022 1/1