□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 09, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

FRANCISCO CHAVERA, JR., § § Petitioner, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00056

BOBBY LUMPKIN, § § Respondent. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 10). The Petitioner was provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Clv. P. 72(b). No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10). Accordingly, Petitioner’s case is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)f The lerk of Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case. ‘SO ORDERED. D . MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas August?7~, 2022 1/1