McGee v. Sanchez
McGee v. Sanchez
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 31, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION KEANTHONY MCGEE, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00034 § JERRY J. SANCHEZ; § ROSALINDA TREVINO; and § RICHARD V. CATHCART, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is the April 6, 2022 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby. (Dkt. No. 7). Magistrate Judge Libby recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff KeAnthony McGee’s complaint under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, (Dkt. No. 1), for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). McGee was provided notice and the opportunity to object. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections were filed, so review is for plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. The Court ACCEPTS the M&R as the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE McGee’s complaint, for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 1). It is SO ORDERED. Signed on August 30, 2022.
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown