Performance Services, Inc. v. Harmony Business Consulting, LLC DO NOT DOCKET - Case transferred to McAllen Division.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Performance Services, Inc. v. Harmony Business Consulting, LLC DO NOT DOCKET - Case transferred to McAllen Division.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 29, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

PERFORMANCE SERVICES, INC., § Plaintiff § § v. § Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-133 § § HARMONY BUSINESS CONSULTING, § LLC, et al, § Defendants §

OPINION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Performance Services, Inc.’s Original Complaint filed on September 23, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. For the reasons provided below, it is ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. I. Jurisdiction This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1332

. II. Legal Standards Pursuant to Section 1404(a) of Title 28, “[f]or the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented.”

28 U.S.C. § 1404

(a). The application of Section 1404(a) is a two-part process. In re Volkswagen AG,

371 F.3d 201, 203

(5th Cir. 2004). A court must first determine if the plaintiff could have filed their complaint in the alternative transferee venue.

Id.

If so, the court must then determine whether the transfer would serve “the convenience of the parties and witnesses” and “the interests of justice.”

Id.

III. Discussion Plaintiff asserts that “venue is proper pursuant to

28 U.S.C.A. § 1391

(b)(2) because a substantial part of the actions and/or omissions giving rise to this claim occurred within the Southern District of Texas.” Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff is located in Indianapolis, Indiana. Jd. at 1. Defendant Harmony Business Consulting, LLC has its principal place of business in Weslaco, Hidalgo County, Texas.

Id. at 1-2

. Defendant Antonio Gonzalez, III resides in Hidalgo County, Texas.

Id. at 2

. In addition, the agreement at issue contemplated consulting services to obtain certain contracts within Hidalgo County.

Id. at 2

. Hidalgo County is in the McAllen Division of the Southern District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. 124(b)(7) (“The McAllen Division comprises the counties of Hidalgo and Starr.”). Neither the parties nor the events that led to the filing of the lawsuit allege any connection to the Brownsville Division of the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, the interests of justice would be served by a transfer to the McAllen Division of the Southern District of Texas. IV. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case in this division.

SIGNED on this 29th day of September, 2022, at Brownsville, Texas.

Unifed States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown