Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 14, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION .

STEPHEN M. GOLDEN, Plaintife | ae

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00153 JAMES F, GOLDEN, et al., □□

"Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 7). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, (D.E. 1), under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with Court orders. (D.E. 7, p. 2). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Clv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 1/2

7). Accordingly, the Court orders that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED with prejudice. (D.E. 1). A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas October (oF 20022

2/2